The finding comes from a data essay published August 20 by Pew’s Data Labs team and written by senior data scientist Samuel Bestvater. It offers one of the clearest long-range pictures yet of how quickly AI-generated text has spread online.
Pew used the Common Crawl web archive to compile almost half a million English-language pages (about 490,000) from snapshots taken between January 2021 and July 2026. The sample precedes the debut of ChatGPT in November 2022, giving the researchers a baseline for comparison. They then took the text of each page and ran it through an open-weight AI detection model called Open Pangram, which looks for statistically significant patterns in word-choice and sentence-structure use to distinguish human writing from computer-generated writing.
In other words, the older web dilutes the headline figure. The newer a page is, the more likely it is to carry AI’s imprint.
AI-written text is not spread evenly. Pew found that in 2021 and 2022, signals of AI authorship appeared at similar low rates across .com, .org, .edu and .gov domains. By 2026 they had diverged.
Put simply, the commercial web has absorbed AI writing far faster than universities and government agencies have, at least on the measure Pew used.
Pew also looked at which stylistic habits have grown more common online. Because AI models learn from huge volumes of human writing, they tend to overuse certain features. Comparing the web of 2026 with a 2023 snapshot, the study reports:
Pew is careful to add that none of these habits proves a text was written by AI, since people use em dashes and Oxford commas too. The signal emerges only when looking across enormous numbers of documents, and detection models weigh many subtler patterns beyond these surface features.
The study carries real caveats. Pew acknowledges that AI detectors are imperfect and can mislabel individual human-written pages as AI-generated, and the reverse. The analysis was also limited to English-language pages, and “written or substantially edited” by AI covers a range of possibilities from fully automated text to a human draft polished by a chatbot. The study looks at the proportion of AI-style text, not whether it is accurate, useful or trustworthy.
For publishers, educators, search engines and everyday readers, the takeaway is that the web is a mixed environment, and the mix is shifting toward machine-assisted writing. Institutional sites have held steady for now, while commercial pages are changing fast.